Helping students to explain what they want from feedback: findings from a large-scale survey
Surveys asking Higher Education students about feedback tend to find similar results: feedback should be prompt, specific, understandable and regular. Efforts to improve the feedback experience therefore emphasises that feedback be more frequent, detailed and turnaround times reduced. However, despite similar wording on many surveys, a significant number of students misunderstand key words such as ‘prompt’. Surveys also typically only get to ask a small number of questions about feedback, so misunderstanding has a significant effect on what can be concluded from students’ responses to these questions.
To try elicit a more nuanced understanding of feedback, 613 students completed a 35-item survey about a specific time they received feedback during a work-based learning placement. Students typically saw feedback as straightforward communication where an expert tells them what to do. This contrasts with more contemporary definitions of feedback as sustainable, learning-oriented practice. However, principal component analysis of the survey responses indicated a pattern of responses which suggests that the vast majority of students tacitly hold a more sophisticated understanding of feedback which they struggled to express. Their patterns of response directly challenge many of the ways that feedback provision is currently monitored, suggesting better ways to evaluate and improve feedback provision.
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for one year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).