This article documents the time taken to assess two different types of final year engineering courses – a more traditional course in which the purpose of assessment is mostly to measure performance, and a second, that uses a multi-stage assessment process to implement an assessment for learning perspective. The research question is to determine what impact these different assessment models have on instructor workload (as measured by time). A quantitative research methodology was adopted. The time taken to assess both courses was carefully recorded during one semester. The main finding was that the multi-stage assignment with feedback originating from the instructor, increased the instructor’s assessment workload by 23% and also resulted in a temporal shift in that workload. The data collected was confined to two courses and this may limit the generalisability of these findings. However, the data is consistent with and supports recent calls to reconceptualise feedback in higher education.
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for one year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).