Perfect Assessment and Feedback in Psychology: Students’ Perspectives
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Assessment and feedback constitute crucial components of the pedagogic process within higher education. However, students report dissatisfaction with these processes and fail to engage with the feedback they receive. This study therefore sought to explore what students consider to be ‘perfect’ assessment and feedback using the criteria outlined in the United Kingdom’s National Student Survey (NSS). Two focus groups were conducted with psychology undergraduate students and thematic analysis was performed. The first focus group explored what students considered to be perfect feedback. Six themes emerged: clear and accessible criteria, consistent and objective marking, specific and general feedback, positivity and recognition, examples and practise; and support and guidance. Notably, a clear desire from students emerged for a greater use of examples throughout the assessment and feedback process. The second focus group explored how students engaged with feedback they have received and factors influencing their engagement. Four themes emerged: attend or avoid; similarity and recency; logistical difficulties; and checkpoints or checklist. Whilst there was variation in how students perceived and engaged with feedback, there was general consensus on how to facilitate engagement and improve feedback.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for one year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).